Scott Plasma TT – My new triathlon bike

For the last three years, I have been looking for a new triathlon bike. There are lots of fantastic bikes out there, including but not limited to the Cervélo P5, Trek Speed Concept, Specialized Shiv, BMC timemachine TM01, Felt IA, Canyon Speedmax CF and more. After a long lasting and very careful analysis of aerodynamic performance, Kona bike stats and more, I finally made up my mind this year which one to buy: The Scott Plasma 3. Introduced in 2010, this bike features most of the design elements as most of today’s superbikes: Deep aero sections, an integrated stem, a rearwheel cutout and the like. But to me, one point where the Scott Plasma 3 sticks out of the mass is it’s mechanical simplicity (for a superbike!). There are no integrated brakes and so on. Nevertheless, in most aerodynamic comparisons, the Scott Plasma 3 is one of the best and its real life performance is equally impressive: Triathlon wins of Marino Vanhoenacker, Sebastian Kienle, Luke McKenzie as well as Time Trial wins of Team Orica Green Edge underline the capabilities of this bike as well as its riders.

Aerodynamic Performance

There are at least as many Aerodynamic tests as there are triathlon bikes. Most of them tend to show that the bike of the manufacturer that conducted the test is superior ;-). And most of the test results cannot be compared to other test results for at least three reasons:

  1. Different test protocols: E.g. different wind speeds, frame with rider or without, wheels moving or not, different sweep angles and so on. If bike A was tested better than bike B according to test protocol X, this doesn’t necessarily mean that the ranking could not be the other way around according to test protocol Y.
  2. Unfortunately, most tests include only a few selected bikes. I have yet to see an Aerodynamic test that includes all current superbikes.
  3. A relatively new trend is that the bike of the manufacturer which is tested is compared to a group of other bikes and not individual bikes. Cervélo is the most prominent example with their P5 white paper.

Out of my perspective, the only meaningful Aerodynamic test that includes the Scott Plasma 3 was conducted by Cervélo in 2011 and published on Slowtwitch. I think the most meaningful chart is with a rider onboard and the fastest bottle configuration. Please note that in this test, the Cervélo P4 was configured in the fast possible way (no spacers, etc.) and all other bikes were configured to match the fit coordinates of the P4. This means that the Scott Plasma 3 was not configured with the flat stem but with a raised one. This did most certainly not improve the aerodynamic performance of the Scott Plasma 3.

20110304_Slowtwitch_Aerodynamic_Comparison_2

Image source: Slowtwitch, http://www.slowtwitch.com/Tech/Cervelo_P4_in_the_Tunnel_1929.html

Looking at the chart, it is quite obvious that under wind angles of -5° to +5°, the Scott Plasma 3 is not the most aerodynamic bike in this test. However, things change in wind angles of -15° to -7.5° and 7.5° to 15°. Under these conditions, the Scott Plasma 3 is either the best bike (non-drive side) or the second best (drive side). And according to an exhaustive analysis of Trek (Speed Concept White Paper, Page 11), effective wind angles of 7.5° to 12.5° occur most often in real life for riding speeds between 29 and 40 km/h.

Overall, the Scott Plasma 3 seems to be the best compromise between top-notch aerodynamic performance and mechanical ease to maintain and to travel with.

Built-Up:

I decided to built up the bike by myself, so I ordered a frameset only. Finally, mid of September, the magic box arrived 😉

20131024_Scott-Plasma-TT_01

It was really hard to take pictures whilst unboxing – yet I wanted to document what’s in the box.

20131024_Scott-Plasma-TT_02

The frame was properly packed to avoid dings or scratches.

20131024_Scott-Plasma-TT_03

It already looks fast, even without wheels attached ;-).

20131024_Scott-Plasma-TT_04

There are two different options of the Scott Plasma 3: The “Premium” version is designed for mechanical shifting and features a rising stem. The “TT” version is designed for electronic shifting with internal cable routing through the flat stem. I decided to go for the latter. Basically, the Scott Plasma TT is still one of the very few superbikes which allow hidden cable routing at the front. And the stem graphics are quite attractive as well.

20131024_Scott-Plasma-TT_05

The top cap of the stem is fastened by four bolts…

20131024_Scott-Plasma-TT_06

…and milled out from the inside. Nevertheless, the complete stem weighs a rather hefty 451g.

20131024_Scott-Plasma-TT_07

20131024_Scott-Plasma-TT_08

Other than that, the box includes other components,

20131024_Scott-Plasma-TT_09

a seatpost which needs to be cut to the appropriate length,…

20131024_Scott-Plasma-TT_10

a Pro Missile Evo Basebar,…

20131024_Scott-Plasma-TT_11

Pro Missile Evo Extensions as well other small items like headset bearings, a cutting tool for the seatpost and an instruction manual.

20131024_Scott-Plasma-TT_12

First of all, I started mounting the brakes. While the frame is designed for standard road brakes, …

20131024_Scott-Plasma-TT_13

the rear brake must be a Shimano BR-7800 or BR-7900 model to avoid a collision of crank and brake.

20131024_Scott-Plasma-TT_14

Brake installation was quite easy and done in about two minutes. This is really one of the big benefits of this frameset.

20131024_Scott-Plasma-TT_15

Front brake installation was as easy.

20131024_Scott-Plasma-TT_16

At this stage, I would to give an recommendation regarding the optimal sequence to install the brake and Di2 cables:

  1. Push rear brake inner wire from bottom bracket to stem, beginning with the plumb
  2. Attach the Di2 cable (950mm) to the brake wire using electric tape and pull back the brake wire from stem to bottom bracket
  3. Loosen Di2 cable
  4. Push rear brake inner wire again from bottom bracket to stem, beginning with the plumb
  5. Push rear brake outer housing over the inner wire, from bottom bracket to stem
  6. Pull out rear brake inner wire
  7. Push outer housing through base bar
  8. Mount brake lever
  9. Push inner wire through brake lever, base bar and stem to the bottom bracket. Recommendation: Do not attach base bar to stem or stem to fork before doing that. The radius of the outer housing will be small which makes pushing the inner cable through nearly impossible.

With wheels and seatpost mounted, it starts to look like a bike.

20131024_Scott-Plasma-TT_17

The carbon pad holders are mounted directly to the extensions. The gel pads appear to be quite comfortable.

20131024_Scott-Plasma-TT_18

With basebar and extensions mounted, all I wanted to do is riding this bike as soon as possible.

20131024_Scott-Plasma-TT_19

Wait, a saddle would be helpful as well – the Ritchey Seat Post mount proved to be a little bit fiddly.

20131024_Scott-Plasma-TT_20

I will reuse my ISM Adamo Time Trial saddle also on the new bike.

20131024_Scott-Plasma-TT_21

To cut the seatpost to it’s correct length, I measured the distance between pedal axle and top of the saddle on my old bike and afterwards measured the same distance on the new bike with the uncut seatpost. The difference between these two measures was the distance I needed to cut off. I marked this distance with a caliper.

20131024_Scott-Plasma-TT_211

Afterwards, I moved the cutting tool to the mark and fastened the two bolts.

20131024_Scott-Plasma-TT_212

Then, I fastened the cutting tool in a bench vice.

20131024_Scott-Plasma-TT_213

Time for the saw.

20131024_Scott-Plasma-TT_214

After a few minutes, the cut was complete.

20131024_Scott-Plasma-TT_215

After installing the basic components, the more delicate part of the build commenced: The installation of Shimano Ultegra Di2 electronic shifting components.

20131024_Scott-Plasma-TT_22

Those consisted out of the JC-41 Rear Junction Box,…

20131024_Scott-Plasma-TT_23

the SM-EW-90A Front Junction Box,…

20131024_Scott-Plasma-TT_24

the SM-BTR-2 internal battery,…

20131024_Scott-Plasma-TT_25

the SM-BCR-2 charger an PC connection,…

20131024_Scott-Plasma-TT_26

the FD-6770 front derailleur,…

20131024_Scott-Plasma-TT_27

the RD-6770 rear derailleur,…

20131024_Scott-Plasma-TT_28

the ST-9071 brake shift levers and…

20131024_Scott-Plasma-TT_29

last not least the ST-R671 extension shifters.

20131024_Scott-Plasma-TT_30

The rear derailleur installation was quite easy, just one bolt which needs to be tightened against the RD hanger. The cable was routed from the rear entry to the bottom bracket, a cable length of 500mm is sufficient.

20131024_Scott-Plasma-TT_31

The internal battery was put into the seatpost. A cable length of 250mm is sufficient. However, to get the battery cable to the bottom, I had to route a brake cable from the bottom bracket to the seat post and pull the battery cable trough.

20131024_Scott-Plasma-TT_33

To mount the front derailleur, first of all a small metal plate needs to be attached to the frame.

20131024_Scott-Plasma-TT_34

This plate is for the front derailleur to push against.

20131024_Scott-Plasma-TT_341

After both derailleurs and the battery were installed, I connected all wires to the rear junction box and pulled one cable from the stem to the rear junction box. Finally, the bottom bracket and the crank could be installed. I reused the SRM SRAM GXP S975 Powermeter which was already installed on my previous bike.

Now comes the rather tricky part – installing all cables in the base bar and the extensions. I started with pushing through the outer brake cables from the stem to the bull horns. Afterwards, I pushed through tiny cables to pull back the shifter wires.

20131024_Scott-Plasma-TT_35

Pushing the cables through the bull horns…

20131024_Scott-Plasma-TT_36

and pulling back the Di2 wires.

20131024_Scott-Plasma-TT_37

The first plug comes out of the base bar – three more to go.

20131024_Scott-Plasma-TT_39

The brake shift lever dangling around the bull horn.

20131024_Scott-Plasma-TT_40

And fixed with a hex key.

20131024_Scott-Plasma-TT_41

The extension shifters mounted to the extensions.

20131024_Scott-Plasma-TT_43

The extension shifter cables have to run trough the spacers beneath the extensions…

20131024_Scott-Plasma-TT_44

and trough the basebar.

20131024_Scott-Plasma-TT_46

The plugs will finally arrive at the cavity of the stem.

20131024_Scott-Plasma-TT_47

The original plan was to put the front junction box into the cavity.

20131024_Scott-Plasma-TT_471

Despite grinding off some plastic extensions of the front junction, I wasn’t successful to achieve that – the box is a couple of millimeters to long.

20131024_Scott-Plasma-TT_472

So I decided to mount the front junction directly beneath the stem and to merge all Di2 wires by a custom junction box within the stem – as a result, only one shifter cable will leave the stem.

20131024_Scott-Plasma-TT_473

20131024_Scott-Plasma-TT_474

This custom junction box is based on a plug most commonly used on PC mainboards.

20131024_Scott-Plasma-TT_50

Before cutting of the original Shimano plugs, I labeled all cables.

20131024_Scott-Plasma-TT_53

After that, I determined the necessary remaining cable length…

20131024_Scott-Plasma-TT_54

and made the cuts.

20131024_Scott-Plasma-TT_55

20131024_Scott-Plasma-TT_56

The newer Shimano electronic shifting gruppos use a so called “eTube platform” which is, from an engineering perspective, a CAN bus system. This system utilizes only two wires for both power supply and signal transmission. So it wasn’t a surprise to find only two wires after removing the insulation.

20131024_Scott-Plasma-TT_57

Instead of soldering all red and all black wires together, I opted to use crimp plugs and housings – again, standard PC hardware.

20131024_Scott-Plasma-TT_58

With a proper crimping tool,…

20131024_Scott-Plasma-TT_59

all cable ends looked like this after about ten minutes.

20131024_Scott-Plasma-TT_60

And with the housing installed.

20131024_Scott-Plasma-TT_61

Plugged into the custom “Pre-Junction”.

20131024_Scott-Plasma-TT_62

The electronic installation was finalized and everything worked like a charm – however, it requires getting used to charging your bike and installing firmware upgrades ;-).

After a few short test rides of about 65k, I realized that the position on the extensions is about 2cm too low when using only the stock spacers. So I decided to build two spacers on my own. I transferred the contour of a spacer to a solid block of aluminium and drilled the holes first.

20131024_Scott-Plasma-TT_63

Afterwards, I used a saw to cut the block into the rough outer dimensions.

20131024_Scott-Plasma-TT_64

The preliminary result looked like that.

20131024_Scott-Plasma-TT_65

After some filing, the spacers looked a bit more like the desired result.

20131024_Scott-Plasma-TT_66

And after some more filing, the work was done.

20131024_Scott-Plasma-TT_67

20131024_Scott-Plasma-TT_68

Completed Build

The completed build looks like this:

Ride Impressions

I will add more to this section later – some first impressions.

  • Electronic shifting is fantastic – especially on a tri bike, it is a great improvement to be able to shift with hands on bull horns.
  • Very stiff frame.
  • Brakes act quite aggressive and are reliable.
  • Position on base bar is quite low.
  • Carbon extensions and basebars are comfortable while riding in the cold: Don’t suck temperature out of the fingers as much as aluminium bars.

Performance

The route I currently ride most frequently is from my office at Frankfurt Airport through the Taunus to Limburg. The route is 62,3km long and has an elevation gain of roughly 420 meters, net elevation gain is about 30 meters.

I would say I am satisfied with the improvement that is for sure not only due to better outside conditions like tailwind and such. The bike doesn’t just look fast, it is fast!

Reviews

Specification Scott Plasma TT

Frame Scott Plasma TT 1.426g
Fork Scott Plasma TT 408g
Headset Ritchey WCS 50g
Rear Derailleur Shimano Ultegra Di2, RD-6770 271g
Front Derailleur Shimano Ultegra Di2, FD-6770 166g
Battery Shimano Di2 SM-BTR2, intern 50g
Junction Box Front: Shimano SM-EW90-A; Rear: Shimano SM-JC41 12g
Extension Shifters Shimano Ultegra Di2, SW-R671 101g
Di2 Cables 1x 500mm RD to JC41, 1x 250mm FD to JC41, 1x 250mm Battery to JC41, 1x 950mm JC41 to SM-EW90 18g
Brake Levers Shimano DuraAce Di2, ST-9071 125g
Brakes Shimano DuraAce, BR-7800 320g
Cassette Shimano Ultegra CS-6700: 11-23 (Race), 11-27, 12-25 (Training) 203g
Wheels – Race Vorderrad: HED Stinger 6; Hinterrad: HED Stinger 60 1.423g
Wheels – Training Shimano WH-RS80-C24-CL 1.460g
Tires – Race Continental Sprinter Gatorskin 544g
Tires – Training Continental Grand Prix GP4000s 602g
Crank SRM SRAM S975 GXP, 175mm 891g
Chainrings SRAM Aero, 55/39 (Race), SRAM Red, 53/39 (Training) g
Bottom Bracket SRAM Truvativ BB86 Pressfit 80g
Stem Scott Plasma TT 451g
Aerobar PRO Missile Evo 681g
Saddle ISM Adamo Time Trial 276g
Seatpost Scott Plasma TT 258g
Pedals Look Keo Classic 341g
Frame Size 54 cm
Weight (ready to ride) 8.640g